ARTICLE

IMPACT OF TIME PRESSURE ON ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR MODERATING ROLE OF CONSCIENTIOUSNESS

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

18 Pages : 317-331

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).18      10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).18      Published : Sep 2018

Impact of Time Pressure on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderating Role of Conscientiousness

Abstract

    In this article, we examined the relation between time pressure and organizational citizenship behavior and the moderating role of conscientiousness. Two hundred and thirty employee working in service sector of different cities located in Pakistan participated in this study. Time lag research design was adopted in this study. Data for time pressure and conscientiousness were collected at time 1 (Self-Reported) and data for organizational citizenship behavior was collected at time 2 (SupervisoryRating Method). Results of this study revealed that time pressure and conscientiousness was negatively related to organizational citizenship behavior. Furthermore, it was found that conscientiousness act as moderator in the relations between time pressure and organizational citizenship behavior. The findings make study significant for improving organizational behavior.

    (1) Tariq Iqbal Khan
    Assistant Professor, Department of Management Science, University of Haripur, Haripur, KP, Pakistan.
    (2) Imran Saeed
    Lecturer, Institute of Business & Management Sciences, University of Agriculture, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
    (3) Sajid Rahman Khattak
    Assistant Professor, Institute of Business & Management Sciences, University of Agriculture, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Babcock-Roberson, M. E., & Strickland, O. J. (2010). The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 144(3), 313-326.
  • Bachrach, D. G., Powell, B. C., Bendoly, E., & Richey, R. G. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: Exploring the impact of task interdependence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 193-201.
  • Bigos, S. J., Battie, M. C., Spengler, D. M., FISHER, L. D., Fordyce, W. E., Hansson, T. H., ... & Wortley, M. D. (1991). A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. Spine,16(1), 1-6.
  • Boerner, S., Dütschke, E., & Schwämmle, A. (2005). [Doing voluntary extra work? Organizational citizenship behavior in the hospital--a comparison between physicians and nurses]. Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 67(11), 770-776.
  • Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2005). The personal costs of citizenship behavior: the relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 740.
  • Borman, W. C. (2004). The concept of organizational citizenship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(6), 238-241.
  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 71.
  • Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors.Academy of management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
  • Cappelli, P., & Rogovsky, N. (1998). Employee Involvement and Organizational Citizenship: Implications for Labor Law Reform and
  • Chiu, S. F., & Chen, H. L. (2005). Relationship between job characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediational role of job satisfaction.Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 33(6), 523-540.
  • Claessens, B. J., Van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2004). Planning behavior and perceived control of time at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 937-950.
  • Eatough, E. M., Chang, C. H., Miloslavic, S. A., & Johnson, R. E. (2011). Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 619.
  • Elfering, A., Grebner, S., Semmer, N., Kaiser‐ Freiburghaus, D., Ponte, L. D., & Witschi, I. (2005). Chronic job stressors and job control: Effects on event‐ related coping success and well‐ being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(2), 237-252.
  • Foote, D. A., & Li-Ping Tang, T. (2008). Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) Does team commitment make a difference in self-directed teams?. Management Decision, 46(6), 933-947.
  • George, J. M., & Bettenhawn, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a senrice context. Joud of Appiied Psychology, 75.698-709
  • Jain, A. K., & Cooper, C. L. (2012). Stress and organisational citizenship behaviours in Indian business process outsourcing organisations. IIMB Management Review, 24(3), 155-163.
  • Jain, A. K., Giga, S. I., & Cooper, C. L. (2013). Perceived organizational support as a moderator in the relationship between organisational stressors and organizational citizenship behaviors. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 21(3), 313-334.
  • Karam, C. M. (2011). Good organizational soldiers: conflict-related stress predicts citizenship behavior. International journal of conflict management,22(3), 300-319.
  • Keinan, G., Friedland, N., & Ben-Porath, Y. (1987). Decision making under stress: Scanning of alternatives under physical threat. Acta Psychologica,64(3), 219-228.
  • Kiffin-Petersen, S. A., Jordan, C. L., & Soutar, G. N. (2011). The big five, emotional exhaustion and citizenship behaviors in service settings: The mediating role of emotional labor. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 43-48.
  • Kuehn, K. W., & Al-Busaidi, Y. (2002). Citizenship behavior in a non-western context: An examination of the role of satisfaction, commitment and job characteristics on self-reported OCB. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 12(2), 107-125.
  • Li, Y. M. (2013). Moderating effects of emotional intelligence in the relationship between emotional labor, emotional exhaustion and organizational citizenship behavior of first-line hotel service staff. Актуальні проблеми економіки, (2), 226-236.
  • Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P., & Organ, D. W. (1993). Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3), 209-225.
  • Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., McKee, D. O., & McMurrian, R. (1997). An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context. The Journal of Marketing, 85-98.
  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
  • Organ, D. W., & Lingl, A. (1995). Personality, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. The journal of social psychology, 135(3), 339-350.
  • Paillé, P. (2010). Perceived stressful work, citizenship behaviour and intention to leave the organization in a high turnover environment: Examining the mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Management Research, 3(1).
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563.
  • Salami, S. O. (2007). Moderating effect of emotional intelligence on the relationship between emotional labour and organizational citizenship behaviour.European Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 142-150.
  • Singh, A. K., & Singh, A. P. (2010). Role of stress and organizational support in predicting organizational citizenship behavior. The IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, IX (4), 7-25.
  • Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational administration quarterly, 38(4), 555-577.
  • Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
  • Van Emmerik, I. H., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2003, August). The relationship between altruism and helping behaviors: some moderating effects of burnout. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2003, No. 1, pp. B1-B6). Academy of Management.
  • Wanzian, L., & Weiwu, W. (2006). A demographic study on citizenship behavior as in-role orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 225-234
  • Zeinabadi, H. (2010). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as antecedents of Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) of teachers.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 998-1003.
  • Zerat, M., Hassani, M., Rashidi, A., Hadidi, M., & Piri, M. (2014). The Moderating Role Of Self-Efficacy In Relationship Between Occupational Stress With Organizational Citizenship Behavior And Job Satisfaction Among Faculty Members Of Urmia University Of Medical Sciences. Journal of Urmia Nursing And Midwifery Faculty, 12(3), 0-0.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Khan, T. I., Saeed, I., & Khattak, S. R. (2018). Impact of Time Pressure on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderating Role of Conscientiousness. Global Social Sciences Review, III(III), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).18

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Khan, Tariq Iqbal, Imran Saeed, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. 2018. "Impact of Time Pressure on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderating Role of Conscientiousness." Global Social Sciences Review, III (III): 317-331 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).18

HARVARD

    HARVARD : KHAN, T. I., SAEED, I. & KHATTAK, S. R. 2018. Impact of Time Pressure on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderating Role of Conscientiousness. Global Social Sciences Review, III, 317-331.

MHRA

    MHRA : Khan, Tariq Iqbal, Imran Saeed, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. 2018. "Impact of Time Pressure on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderating Role of Conscientiousness." Global Social Sciences Review, III: 317-331

MLA

    MLA : Khan, Tariq Iqbal, Imran Saeed, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. "Impact of Time Pressure on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderating Role of Conscientiousness." Global Social Sciences Review, III.III (2018): 317-331 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Khan, Tariq Iqbal, Saeed, Imran, and Khattak, Sajid Rahman (2018), "Impact of Time Pressure on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderating Role of Conscientiousness", Global Social Sciences Review, III (III), 317-331

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Khan, Tariq Iqbal, Imran Saeed, and Sajid Rahman Khattak. "Impact of Time Pressure on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Moderating Role of Conscientiousness." Global Social Sciences Review III, no. III (2018): 317-331. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-III).18